Time for
July 10th, 2006 by Kevin Dayhoff
A Yahoo News video report this morning says, “‘Japan Considers Strike Against North Korea.’
Additionally, Yahoo News is carrying an Associated Press article by Mari Yamauchi this morning that certainly begins to put the crisis over
That is, if the world and the United Nations won’t live up to its responsibilities, perhaps
Meanwhile, where is
Okay, asking
Gee, if this isn’t déjà vu all over again.
When President George W. Bush was attempting to reign in
Well, duh, the reason we could get no cooperation out of the French, Germans and Russians was simple. They were making too much money off of Saddam Hussein. Oh never mind that he was a weapon of mass destruction all by himself, as long as they were making money, what the heck. Besides, the
In a case of situational ethics, Senator Hilary Clinton has said that the president’s policy on
What was it that she said, that the president was outsourcing United States foreign policy. Oi gevald!
But other liberals have criticized the president for acting unilaterally in
My moonbat decoder ring is not helping me at the moment as to just what the liberals would want us to do with
Maybe it is time that
Won’t
Okay
For a reality check, any pre-emptive strike against
And oh, I did decide to somewhat ignore the issue of one wonders what all the moonbat, “cut and run” anti-military folks in California think of the current sorry state of affairs now that North Korea is trying to plug in the coordinates of San Francisco into their rockets.
So far, the only folks in peril from the North Koreans are fisherman in the
One wonders which side of her mouth California Senator Dianne Feinstein or Representative Nancy Pelosi is currently using - now that it may settling-in on her that Cindy Sheehan or Michael Moore are no match for the North Koreans.
And also remember, it is a San Franciscan city councilmember that questions why the
It’s time, for some other nations and American elected officials to take on a renewed sense of responsibility in these matters. Perhaps that time is now. /Kevin Dayhoff
_________________
Japan may postpone North Korea resolution
By MARI YAMAGUCHI, Associated Press Writer 52 minutes ago
TOKYO - Japan said Monday it was considering whether a pre-emptive strike on North Korea's missile bases would violate its constitution, signaling a hardening stance ahead of a possible U. N. Security Council vote on
The vote itself could be delayed for several days, a news agency reported.
China asked Japan to postpone the vote until later this week and Japan is prepared to accept, Kyodo News agency said.
Japanese officials had earlier vowed to push ahead with a resolution that would impose sanctions on North Korea for its missile tests last week, but said
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi told reporters his government wants a vote on the measure "as soon as possible."
"I think we must send a message that's as clear as possible" to
Japan was badly rattled by North Korea's missile tests last week and several government officials openly discussed whether the country ought to take steps to better defend itself, including setting up the legal framework to allow Tokyo to launch a pre-emptive strike against Northern missile sites.
"If we accept that there is no other option to prevent an attack ... there is the view that attacking the launch base of the guided missiles is within the constitutional right of self-defense. We need to deepen discussion," Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said.
Read the rest of the Yahoo News article here.
Kevin Dayhoff writes from
Having been to South Korea and stared across the border at millions of North Korean soldiers and artillery pieces, I’m a staunch supporter of Japan (a close ally of the US) rearming.
ReplyDelete