Journalist @baltimoresun writer artist runner #amwriting Chaplain PIO #partylikeajournalist

Journalist @baltimoresun writer artist runner #amwriting Chaplain PIO #partylikeajournalist
Journalist @baltimoresun writer artist runner #amwriting Md Troopers Assoc #20 & Westminster Md Fire Dept Chaplain PIO #partylikeajournalist
Showing posts with label US Congress Representatives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Congress Representatives. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

20071002 SCHIP Congressman Bartlett casts the correct vote

SCHIP Congressman Bartlett casts the correct vote

SCHIP - Senate Majority Leader Reid singles out Rep. Roscoe Bartlett's vote

October 2nd, 2007

I can understand that it was not an easy vote – but it was the correct vote. Thank you Congressman Bartlett...


From: Wright, Lisa

Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:35 PM

Subject: SCHIP - Senate Majority Leader Reid singles out Rep. Roscoe Bartlett's vote

“I want to thank Majority Leader Henry Reid for recognizing that I cast the only correct vote about SCHIP in the state of Maryland,” said Congressman Roscoe Bartlett upon learning that the Senate Majority Leader mentioned today there was only one vote in Maryland to sustain the President’s veto of the SCHIP expansion.

Congressman Bartlett added, “I’m proud that I voted to create the SCHIP program in 1997. I want to help the working poor, but Democrats are demanding that SCHIP be expanded to have government-controlled, taxpayer-paid health care for millions of children who already have private health coverage.”

Lisa Lyons Wright

Press Secretary/Energy and Stem Cell Legislative Assistant

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett

2412 Rayburn

####

Friday, July 13, 2007

20070712 Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Votes "No" on the Iraq Withdrawal Bill

Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Votes "No" on the Iraq Withdrawal Bill

and FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 624

July 12th, 2007

Washington, DC - Congressman Roscoe G. Bartlett (R-6-MD) voted "no" on H.R. 2956, a bill that would force a precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. Bartlett is a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee and ranking member of the Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee.

The bill passed by a vote of 223 - 201.

"I have long argued that a date certain for withdrawal of American troops will do more harm than good," said Congressman Bartlett. "Giving enemies a target date puts Americans deployed in Iraq in greater danger. The rationale for offering this resolution is weakened by the release of today's interim report. I have consistently called for benchmarks to measure progress. This interim report shows some progress on important benchmarks since the surge deployment was completed less than three weeks ago. This resolution also ignores the potential that a commitment to withdraw U.S. forces could also endanger the lives of many more Iraqis."

ICYMI Natan Sharansky is a former Soviet dissident who was imprisoned for nine years in the gulag, is chairman of the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies in Jerusalem. He wrote in The Washington Post on July 8, 2007 that, "some leaders continue to play down the gross violations in Iraq under Hussein's republic of fear and ignore the potential for a human rights catastrophe should the United States withdraw...in totalitarian regimes, there are no human rights. Period. For most people, life under totalitarianism is slavery with no possibility of escape. That is why despite the carnage in Iraq, Iraqis are consistently less pessimistic about the present and more optimistic about the future of their country than Americans are. That is why, at a time when many Americans are abandoning the vision of a democratic Iraq, most Iraqis still cling to the hope of a better future. They know that under Hussein, there was no hope. No one can know for sure whether President Bush's 'surge' of U.S. troops in Iraq will succeed. But those who believe that human rights should play a central role in international affairs should be doing everything in their power to maximize the chances that it will. A precipitous withdrawal of U.S. forces could lead to a bloodbath that would make the current carnage pale by comparison."

###

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 624

(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

H R 2956 YEA-AND-NAY 12-Jul-2007 6:13 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act

Yeas Nays PRES NV
Democratic 219 10 2
Republican 4 191 6
Independent
TOTALS 223 201 8

20070712 Final Vote Tables

---- YEAS 223 ---

Abercrombie
Ackerman
Allen
Altmire
Andrews
Arcuri
Baca
Baird
Baldwin
Bean
Becerra
Berman
Berry
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd (FL)
Boyda (KS)
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carson
Castor
Chandler
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Cramer
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis, Lincoln
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly
Doyle
Duncan
Edwards
Ellison
Emanuel
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Giffords
Gilchrest
Gillibrand
Gonzalez
Gordon
Green, Al

Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Herseth Sandlin
Higgins
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hodes
Holt
Honda
Hooley
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (NC)
Jones (OH)
Kagen
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind
Klein (FL)
Lampson
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Lynch
Mahoney (FL)
Maloney (NY)
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum (MN)
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McNerney
McNulty
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Melancon
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy, Patrick
Murtha
Nadler
Napolitano

Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peterson (MN)
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Rodriguez
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sestak
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shuler
Sires
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Solis
Space
Spratt
Stark
Stupak
Sutton
Tanner
Tauscher
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Towns
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch (VT)
Wexler
Wilson (OH)
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn
Yarmuth

---- NAYS 201 ---

Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Bachmann
Bachus
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp (MI)
Campbell (CA)
Cannon
Cantor
Capito
Carney
Carter
Castle
Chabot
Coble
Cole (OK)
Conaway
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Davis, David
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doolittle
Drake
Dreier
Ehlers
Ellsworth
English (PA)
Everett
Fallin
Feeney
Ferguson
Flake
Forbes
Fortenberry
Fossella
Foxx
Franks (AZ)

Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gillmor
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goode
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Hall (TX)
Hastert
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Hobson
Hoekstra
Holden
Hulshof
Hunter
Inglis (SC)
Issa
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Keller
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline (MN)
Knollenberg
Kucinich
Kuhl (NY)
LaHood
Lamborn
Latham
LaTourette
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
LoBiondo
Lucas
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Marshall
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul (TX)
McCotter
McCrery
McHenry
McHugh
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Musgrave

Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Poe
Porter
Price (GA)
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Radanovich
Ramstad
Regula
Rehberg
Reichert
Renzi
Reynolds
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Sali
Saxton
Schmidt
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shays
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Snyder
Souder
Stearns
Sullivan
Taylor
Terry
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden (OR)
Walsh (NY)
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weller
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (FL)

---- NOT VOTING 8 ---

Berkley
Conyers
Cubin

Davis, Jo Ann
Jindal
Paul

Tancredo
Young (AK)

Thursday, June 28, 2007

20070627 Four Bartlett Amendments Strengthen Biofuels and Solar Bills

Four Bartlett Amendments Strengthen Biofuels and Solar Bills

June 27, 2007

Washington, DC – Four amendments by Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-6-MD) were among nine offered by Republicans that were approved today as part of legislation by the House Science and Technology Committee. The Committee approved four bills.

Two promoted research and development (R&D) into alternative and renewable energies.

A third bill updated an Administration database for climate change data management.

The fourth bill studies the potential for carbon capture and storage technologies.

The Bartlett amendments made substantive improvements to biofuels and solar energy research and development bills.

Congressman Bartlett said, “The Science and Technology Committee has been extremely active approving energy-related bills. I was very pleased by the cooperation and collaboration by Chairman Bart Gordon (D-TN), Chairman Nick Lampson (D-TX) and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) and their staff who worked with me to make these very good bills better and more comprehensive.”

The following bills were approved by the Committee today by voice vote:

H.R. 2774, the Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007, introduced by Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ);

H.R. 2773, the Biofuels Research and Development Enhancement Act, introduced by Energy and Environment Chairman Nick Lampson (D-TX);

H.R. 1933, the Department of Energy Carbon Capture and Storage Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 2007, introduced by Space and Aeronautics Chairman Mark Udall (D-CO); and

H.R. 906, Global Change Research and Data Management Act of 2007, introduced by Chairman Udall and Energy and Environment Ranking Member Bob Inglis (R-SC).

Congressman Bartlett had two amendments approved as part of H.R. 2773, the Biofuels Research and Development Enhancement Act.

One Bartlett amendment changed Section 4, which directs the Secretary of Energy to submit to the Congress within 180 days a report on any research and development challenges inherent in increasing the proportion of diesel sold in the U.S. to 5 percent biodiesel.

The Bartlett amendment cuts that proportion in half to 2.5 percent. “It is important for the biofuels program enacted under this bill to be realistic and to take account of the food vs. fuel trade-off inherent with biodiesel,” said Congressman Bartlett.

A National Academies of Science (NAS) study released on July 25, 2006, “Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels,” found that if the entire 2005 soybean crop was used to make biodiesel, it would have provided a net energy gain discounted for the fossil fuel input equivalent to just 2.9% of U.S. diesel consumption.

The NAS study is posted at: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0604600103v1

Congressman Bartlett joined his colleague, Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), in offering a second amendment considering the environment impact and adding the goal of making biofuels production sustainable. It also added a study on the effects of expanded biodiesel production on the food supply for humans and animals.

“This amendment complements the announcement made yesterday by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Samuel W. Bodman that DOE will invest up to $375 million in three new Bioenergy Research Centers intended to accelerate basic as well as applied research in the development of cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels,” said Congressman Bartlett.

“The changes in this amendment clarify the intent of Congress that federal government studies of biofuels address the potential food versus fuel trade-offs. It also explicitly addresses the tendency for stove piping that can isolate expertise by and within Departments. Research under this bill should complement rather than duplicate ongoing federal government efforts at the Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency.” A separate amendment added consultation with the Department of Transportation.

Congressman Bartlett also had two amendments approved as part of H.R. 2774, the Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007.

One amendment added a section to establish a research, development and demonstration program to promote less costly and more reliable decentralized and distributed solar-powered air conditioning for individuals and businesses.

Congressman Bartlett said, “This amendment is designed to produce renewable energy powered decentralized and distributed electricity, reduce peak load electricity demands and contribute to greater resilience of the grid.”

Congressman Bartlett’s solar air conditioning amendment was supported by:

The DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building America Program; National Renewable Energy Laboratory; Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA); Western Renewables Group; Austin Energy; Sacramento Municipal Utility District, and San Diego Gas & Electric.

Congressman Bartlett’s second amendment added a new section on Daylighting Systems and Direct Solar Pipe Technology. “I am grateful to Congressman Tom Petri (R-WI) for alerting me to the opportunity to expand advances in these technologies,” said Congressman Bartlett.

This amendment to help move electricity generation off the grid by establishing a research and demonstration program and commercial application of direct solar renewable energy sources to provide alternatives to traditional power generation for lighting and illumination and to promote greater energy conservation and improved efficiency.

For more information CONTACT: Lisa Wright or Monica DeLong at 202-225-2721

###

20070627 Going green is patriotic and profitable

SPECIAL SECTION: Going Green, The Hill Newspaper, June 27, 2007

Going green is patriotic and profitable

By Reps. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.) and Tom Udall (D-N.M.), and Allison Macfarlane

June 27, 2007

While "going green" is certainly good for the planet and good for the people who live on the planet, there's a case to be made that even the climate change skeptics can believe in: Going green is also good for profits and patriotism.

Bartlett is a member of the House Science and Technology Committee, Udall is a member of the House Appropriations Committee and Macfarlane is associate professor of Environmental Science and Policy at George Mason University.

SPECIAL SECTION: Going Green

Senate's work on energy a good start

Renewable portfolio standards

Buildings for the 21st Century Act would expand tax break for green construction

ANWR not answer

America's energy future needs to be stable, diverse and affordable

Congress should deliver on its diesel pledge

Going green is patriotic and profitable

####

AMEN!

http://thehill.com/op-eds/going-green-is-patriotic-and-profitable-2007-06-27.html

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

20070625 Congressman Bartlett Applauds Today’s Supreme Court Opinion

Congressman Bartlett Applauds Today’s Supreme Court Opinion

Striking a blow for the 1st Amendment.

June 25, 2007

My Tentacle column this Wednesday will be on the “Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life” and “McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life” Supreme Court Decision:

Many are singing high praise of the U. S. Supreme Court decision handed down last Monday which took a bite out of the McCain Feingold campaign reforms.

The ruling has been applauded by the unusual alliance of powerful unions, big business, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The court decided in “Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life” and “McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life”; that restrictions on issue ads run by “special interests” in the waning days before an election are an unconstitutional infringement on free speech.

Initial analysis indicates that the decision will have an impact on the 2008 elections…

Meanwhile Congressman Bartlett says:

Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Applauds Today’s Supreme Court Opinion to Help Restore First Amendment Political Speech Rights

Washington, D.C. – The Supreme Court today substantially weakened the McCain-Feingold campaign finance act's restrictions on the type of advertisement non-profit grassroots organizations, corporations and special interest groups may run in the days before an election. Congressman Bartlett said, “It is a step in the right direction for First Amendment political speech rights. My bill, the First Amendment Restoration Act (H.R. 71), goes much further to restore Americans’ First Amendment rights by repealing the “electioneering communication” provision at issue in today’s Supreme Court opinion.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. wrote the 5-4 opinion for the court, stating that Wisconsin Right-to-Life should have been allowed to broadcast ads before the 2004 race for the United States Senate in that state. The portion of the law in question in the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) states that labor unions and corporations (including non-profits) cannot use money from their general treasuries to broadcast ads that run 30 days before a primary or 60 days before a general election, are aimed at a relevant electorate and mention a federal candidate by name.

The difference between so-called "issue ads," which are allowed, and those that "express advocacy," which are banned, is often hard to define, Chief Justice Roberts stated. In today's decision, the Supreme Court created a constitutional safe harbor for genuine issue ads. It stated that, only if the ad “is susceptible of no reasonable interpretation other than as an appeal to vote for or against a specific candidate” can the ad be prohibited during the blackout period. “Chief Justice Roberts’ reasoning is significant,” Congressman Bartlett said. Chief Justice Roberts reasoned, “In drawing that line, the First Amendment requires us to err on the side of protecting political speech rather than suppressing it.”

Congressman Bartlett said, “The reason that I introduced H.R. 71 (H.R. 689 in the 109th Congress, first introduced as H.R. 3801 in the 108th Congress) is because I am firmly committed to protecting our Constitution. As stated in the First Amendment to the Constitution, ‘Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.’ No constitutional right is absolute; however, it is clearly a violation of the First Amendment to restrict organized group communications and limit what people can say about a candidate and when they may choose to speak out.”

“I, along with many others including the President, believe that the Supreme Court made a mistake in the December 2003 decision upholding the constitutionality of the 30-60 day provision,” said Congressman Bartlett. “The 30-60 day BCRA provision eviscerates the central purpose of the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech – the protection of political speech. My bill would simply repeal this provision. Today’s Supreme Court decision, however, does help to weaken the unconstitutional BCRA provision.”

###

For more information Contact: Lisa Wright or Monica DeLong at (202) 225-2721

Friday, June 22, 2007

20070622 May 18th 2007 to President Bush against excessive spending


June 22, 2007

Congressman Roscoe Bartlett was one of 147 Members of the House of Representatives who signed a May 18, 2007 letter to President Bush pledging to uphold vetoes of bills with excessive spending.

146 votes are needed to uphold a veto.

Information about the letter is posted at: May 18th, 2007 to President Bush against excessive spending

“… a list of members who have signed the RSC Spending Veto Letter to uphold the President’s veto of any federal spending bill that exceeds his budget request. Read more here and here.”

The letter is posted here.

####

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

20070620 Earmarks: A Bridge to Bankruptcy


June 20, 2007 by Kevin E. Dayhoff

My Tentacle column is up and it involves an issue that crosses party lines and simply must be addressed – pork, earmarks, Congressional discretionary spending…

I have written about this mess before, see: 20060503 Congressional Pork: The Other Red Meat by Kevin Dayhoff

Please also note that since this column was filed early Tuesday morning, June 19th, 2007, Congressman Roscoe Bartlett (R – 6 Dist., MD) has released information on all his earmarks – please see: 20070619 Congressman Bartlett releases his earmarks

Earmarks: A Bridge to Bankruptcy

June 20, 2007 by Kevin E. Dayhoff

After months of bitter fighting, the surge on "earmarks," our own homegrown version of economic terrorism, continues to meet stiff resistance.

The Great Porkbusters War has now raged in a "Twilight Zone" for over 18 months with no resolution in sight. The initial "Porkbusters" grassroots effort was launched in September 2005 by conservative political commentator Glenn Reynolds as an effort "to cut 'pork barrel' spending by the U.S. Congress."

Sen. Tom Coburn (R.,OK,) whom political commentator Mark Tapscott has credited with spearheading the war on earmarks, quickly saw an opportunity to strike a major blow against earmarks and proposed the "Coburn Amendment" to a broad, sweeping appropriations bill, which had been introduced in June of that year.

The Coburn Amendment attempted to remove money from the bill. It specifically addressed the $220 million so-called "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska and the reconstruction of the "Twin Spans Bridge" in Louisiana. The amendment was defeated 82-15, but it put Congress on notice that a grassroots war on secret, discretionary congressional spending on pet projects had begun.

By now the Democrats had discovered the issue as politically expedient and in March 2006, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D., CA) held a press conference in which she railed against earmarks.

It was political theatre at its best…

Read the rest of the column here: Earmarks: A Bridge to Bankruptcy

####

20070619 Congressman Bartlett releases his earmarks

Congressman Bartlett releases his earmarks

June 19th, 2007

See also:

20061006 Congressman Bartlett announces 100M in Federal Funding for 6th Dist. and MD


Note: This arrived in an e-mail after I had filed my Tentacle column for Wednesday, June 20th, 2007 in which I said:

Just yesterday (early Tuesday morning, June 19th, 2007) CNN reported: "Despite the new Democratic congressional leadership's promise of 'openness and transparency' in the budget process, a CNN survey of the House found it nearly impossible to get information on lawmakers' pet projects. Staffers for only 31 of the 435 members of the House contacted by CNN between Wednesday and Friday of last week supplied a list of their earmark requests for Fiscal Year 2008."

Of the Maryland congressmen contacted, not one of the eight representatives responded. Not one.

Obviously, Congressman Bartlett has been forthcoming about his earmark requests… In the e-mail in which I received this, there were two PDF documents which delineated his defense funding requests and his non-defense funding requests. Unfortunately, I cannot put PDFs on “Soundtrack.” But hopefully The Tentacle will put them up…


For additional information please Contact: Lisa Wright 202-225-2721


Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Releases His Federal Budget Appropriations Funding Requests for FY 2008


Washington, DC - Congressman Roscoe Bartlett (R-6-MD) today released a list of his funding requests for the Fiscal Year 2008 Federal Budget. "I am proud of my requests.


In previous years, I followed the established procedure and waited until appropriations bills were finalized to distribute news releases with my list of requests that received funding. With greater public interest and the support of Republicans to reform the Congressional budget process, I am releasing the requests for funding that I have submitted." Congressman Bartlett's requests are posted on his website at www.bartlett.house.gov.


Congressman Bartlett added, "Each year I am grateful that I can apply more than twenty years of engineering experience along with my fifteen years on the House Armed Services, Science and Small Business Committees to make requests for additional federal funding not included in the President's Budget that will contribute to meet national goals and provide value to the taxpayers."


As Maryland's only Member of Congress on an Armed Services Committee, and the Ranking Member of the Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee, the majority of Congressman Bartlett's requests are defense-related. Congressman Bartlett is also one of three scientists in the Congress.


All requests that Congressman Bartlett makes are thoroughly reviewed through the committee and house processes. Funding for specific projects and the amount of funding will not be finalized until appropriations bills are signed into law.

###

Friday, May 25, 2007

20070523 Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Votes No on “Feel Good, But Counterproductive” Price Gouging Bill

Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Votes No on “Feel Good, But Counterproductive” Price Gouging Bill

May 23, 2007

Washington, DC – Congressman Roscoe Bartlett voted against “the feel good, but counterproductive” Federal Price Gouging Prevention Act (H.R. 1252).

“Congress can’t suspend the economic laws of supply and demand,” said Congressman Bartlett. “This well-intentioned, but destructive bill, would take us back to the future of the 1970’s policies of Jimmy Carter that led to gasoline shortages, gas lines and rationing.”

The Federal Trade Commission found no evidence of price gouging from investigations after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Nowhere in H.R. 1252 are key terms such as “unconscionably excessive,” “unfair advantage,” “unreasonably,” “reasonably foreseeable,” “grossly exceeds,” “reasonably reflected,” “substantially attributable,” or “usual seasonal demand variations” defined explicitly. They are marked for emphasis in red italics.

H.R. 1252 would make it a federal crime for any person to sell, at wholesale or at retail in an area and during a period of an energy emergency, gasoline or any other petroleum distillate covered by a presidential proclamation at a price that is unconscionably excessive and indicates the seller is taking unfair advantage of the circumstances related to an energy emergency to increase prices unreasonably.”

The bill would authorize the President to issue an unlimited number of 30-day energy emergency proclamations (one at a time) for any area within the jurisdiction of the United States, during which the price-crime provision above would apply. A proclamation, which could be issued up to one week in advance of a reasonably foreseeable emergency, would have to state the geographic area covered, the gasoline or other petroleum distillate covered, and the time period that such proclamation would be in effect.

In determining whether such a violation has occurred, the following factors would have to be considered:

whether the amount charged by a person for the applicable product at a given location in a proclamation-covered area:

grossly exceeds the average price at which the applicable gasoline or other

petroleum distillate was offered for sale by that person during the 30 days prior

to such proclamation;

grossly exceeds the price at which the same or similar gasoline or other

petroleum distillate was readily obtainable in the same area from other

competing sellers during the same period;

reasonably reflected additional costs, not within the control of that person,

that were paid, incurred, or reasonably anticipated by that person, or reflected

additional risks taken by that person to produce, distribute, obtain, or sell

such product under the circumstances; and

“was substantially attributable to local, regional, national, or international

market conditions; and

whether the quantity of the applicable product the person produced, distributed, or sold in a proclamation-covered area during a 30-day period following the issuance of such proclamation increased over the quantity that that person produced, distributed, or sold during the 30 days prior to such proclamation, taking into account usual seasonal demand variations.”

H.R. 1252 would also make it a federal crime for any person to report to a federal agency information related to the wholesale price of gasoline or other petroleum distillates “with actual knowledge or knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances” that such information is false or misleading.

###

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

20070522 Rep. Roscoe Bartlett Salutes Veterans at Reeders Memorial Home

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett Salutes Veterans at Reeders Memorial Home

The Herald-Mail ONLINE

http://www.herald-mail.com

Tuesday May 22, 2007

Veterans, National Guard, recruits represented at Reeders Memorial Day program

by MARLO BARNHART
marlob@herald-mail.com

BOONSBORO - The past, present and future of the American military were well represented Monday morning at the Reeders Memorial Home Memorial Day holiday program.

Seventeen residents of Reeders were honored as veterans during the outdoor ceremony, where they received recognition personally from U.S. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett.

See photos and the complete text at:

http://www.herald-mail.com/?module=displaystory&story_id=166217&format=html

Friday, May 18, 2007

20070517 Bipartisan Defense Authorization Bill Approved by Full House


Bipartisan Defense Authorization Bill Approved by Full House

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett and other Republicans Support Bipartisan Defense Authorization Bill Approved by Full House

For Immediate Release: May 17, 2007

Contact: Josh Holly; 202.226.3988

PRESS RELEASE

Annual Defense Authorization Bill Clears House of Representatives

Focus on Personnel Benefits, Force Protection Measures and Immediate Needs of America's Warfighters

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Republican members of the House Armed Services Committee today lauded House passage of H.R. 1585, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, by a strong bipartisan vote of 397-27. H.R. 1585 authorizes $503.8 billion in discretionary budget authority for the Department of Defense (DoD) and the national security programs of the Department of Energy. Additionally, the legislation authorizes $142 billion in supplemental funding to support current operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Global War on Terrorism.

Member statements follow:

Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA): "This year's defense authorization bill is good. It reflects our strong support for the brave men and women of the United States armed forces. It authorizes the President's discretionary request of $503.8 billion for the Fiscal Year 2008 base budget of the Department of Defense and the national security programs of the Department of Energy.

"This amount provides for end-strength growth in both the Army and Marine Corps, continuing initiatives started several years ago by the Armed Services Committee: in fiscal year 2008 the Army would be authorized 525,400-13,000 more than authorized last year-and the Marine Corps would be authorized 189,000-9,000 more than last year. The bill also includes $142 billion to cover Fiscal Year 2008 war costs.

"Some of the initiatives in this legislation continue or build upon successful programs or reinforce good legislation that the House has already passed. For example, this legislation contains provisions that are essential to maintain a robust defense industrial base. Last year, the defense authorization bill tried to strike a fair balance between requiring the use of domestic specialty metals for our weapons systems and offering a waiver process in case sufficient metals are not available. H.R. 1585 establishes a formal rulemaking process for waivers that apply to multiple contracts to facilitate transparency and the gathering of broad industry input. In this way, the market will be able to respond to supply shortages, fostering investment in domestic industries.

"Other initiatives in this bill modify existing authorities or establish promising new programs and policies-such as adding $4.1 billion for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle.

"Separately, H.R. 1585 levels the playing field between U.S. companies and foreign countries with which we have free trade agreements. It rectifies a critical flaw in the U.S. Code that effectively penalizes U.S. companies for complying with U.S. law, while allowing foreign manufacturers to provide non-compliant components and systems.

"I am very grateful to Chairman Skelton (D-MO), Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ), Rep. John McHugh (R-NY), Rep. Terry Everett (R-AL), Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), Rep. Jo Ann Davis (R-VA) and all the members of the House for their hard work in approving of this important legislation. I'm especially appreciative of Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) and Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) for their efforts to add back funding for the Army's modernization program and missile defense programs respectively."

Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ): "H.R. 1585 reflects an objective of balancing the health and capability of the current force with the needs of future capability. Once again, this bill places force protection issues at the top of the priority list for Congress. By including $4.1 billion for Army and Marine Corps Mine Resistance Ambush Protected vehicles, we will ensure our forces in Iraq have the needed state-of-the-art equipment to defend against improvised explosive devices. Additionally, we take a step toward meeting our airlift needs by providing $2.4 billion for an additional ten C-17's.

"As proud as I am of this legislation, I also recognize that this bill reflects a funding reduction of $867 million to the Army's Future Combat Systems (FCS) program, a decrement that amounts to more than the cuts in the last three years combined. Modernization ensures the readiness of our future force and is a strategic necessity. I agree that the Army needs a higher top-line, but the Army's funding crisis cannot be solved by making such large reductions to the FCS program. The Army must be allowed to invest in technologies and equipment that enable our most important asset-the soldier-to remain more effective than our adversaries, who are quickly adapting their methods, tactics, and tools of warfare."

Rep. John McHugh (R-NY): "The passage of H.R. 1585, the Fiscal Year 2008 Defense Authorization Act, by the House recognizes that the success of the United States Military rests with our fighting men and women. H.R. 1585 contains many important programs and benefits they so richly deserve, including increases in end strength, which is something HASC has taken up and must continue to seek as embodied in this bill.

"Also among the bill's many important provisions is the raise in basic pay that will continue the eight year effort to increase the pay of our men and women in uniform. At the same time we're drawing down that pay gap between the civilian and military forces so that by 2012 it will be as little as 1.5%.

"I am also pleased that H.R. 1585 addresses military healthcare by extending for one year the prohibitions we enacted last year on increases to TRICARE cost shares and premiums and retail pharmacy cost share increases.

"This legislation was arrived at in a bipartisan, productive fashion and I am proud to have worked with my HASC colleagues to support our troops both at home and abroad."

Rep. Terry Everett (R-AL): "While I support most of the provisions in this legislation, like many on my side of the aisle, I remain concerned about the topline cut levied on missile defense programs, especially when progress is being seen in so many of their programs. Now is not the time to further reduce funding, or slow down, the development and fielding of those missile defense elements that are critical to our nation's defense and the protection of our deployed forces and allies. I understand the need to focus on near-term capabilities, but as we go through conference with the Senate, we need to work together to identify the right balance between investments in near-term systems and future capabilities.

"In the area of space, the legislation contains a provision I strongly support which places a priority on the protection of our space assets, and increases funding for space situational awareness and operationally responsive space capabilities. Consistent with previous bipartisan efforts to improve space acquisition, H.R. 1585 continues its emphasis on program execution. The bill reflects a measured approach to space acquisition that overlaps new modernization programs with continuing legacy programs.

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD): "On balance, this is an excellent bipartisan bill that serves the immediate war-fighting needs as well as future challenges facing the men and women volunteers in our Armed Forces who serve our nation and the cause of peace throughout the world with selfless professionalism. It is a product of hard work and dedication by the leadership, Members and staff of the Armed Services Committee. I am particularly grateful for the continuing friendship and collaboration with Congressman Gene Taylor, Chairman of the Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee. This bill promotes continuing measures to increase the capability and reduce shipbuilding costs to maintain America's naval supremacy.

"We worked with Chairman Skelton, Ranking Member Hunter and our colleagues on the Air and Land Subcommittee to authorize the number one priority recommending $4.1 billion for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle to better protect soldiers and Marines from IED's that are the number one cause of injuries and deaths in Iraq.

"We put limitations on design and build concurrency and promoted the adoption of shipyard modernization to reduce factors that have contributed to cost increases in a number of programs. We addressed specific problems with LCS while ensuring continued competition between the two designs. With these changes, we authorize construction of eight ships. We took steps to reduce the vulnerability and manning requirements of the fleet's logistical tail that is dependent upon oil by requiring nuclear propulsion for the next generation cruiser. We also recommend additional funding for long lead items and multi-year procurement authority to provide flexibility to accelerate construction of Virginia Class submarines to two per year. "

Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX): "There is much that is in this bill that is good; however, next week or the week thereafter, we are going to have another vote that could undercut the good that is in this bill by giving hope to our enemies and discouragement to our friends. We face a ruthless, determined, adaptable adversary who at this moment is concentrating their efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, but poses a threat to us and our allies all over the world. Congress can not pat itself on the back for passing a pay raise for the troops one week, but then tie the hands of the commanders who are sent to implement the Nation's strategy the next week."

Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK): "I am pleased to see that once again the House has passed a comprehensive, bi-partisan defense authorization bill for Fiscal Year 2008. These funds will support a broad range of fundamental programs as well as national security activities that are vital for the safety of America. This bill will take care of our soldiers on the battlefield and back home by improving military health care, soldier's pay and benefits, and upgrading the living conditions for soldiers and their families. Our brave men and women in uniform deserve nothing less."

Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA): "Providing for our nation's defense is the foremost responsibilities of this body, and we must oppose any effort to shortchange our troops and our security. While I opposed portions of this legislation that cut funding to critical programs like missile defense and Army Future Combat Systems, overall I believe it is a good bill that will fund both the on-going War on Terror and our efforts to combat more traditional threats. I am relieved Congress focused on the needs of our warfighters, and defeated many amendments that simply pandered to the partisan issues which divide us."

Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ): "This bill does include many elements that are important for our defense. However, in this age of nuclear weapons, ballistic missile development, rampant missile proliferation, and jihadist terrorism, the Democrats still insisted on cutting $764 million for a robust and layered ballistic missile defense. I offered an amendment to restore these funds and it failed with 216 Democrats voting against it and 186 Republicans voting in support. This should not be a partisan issue; but it has clearly demonstrated to the American people where their Representatives stand on this issue."

Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA): "The House came together in a bipartisan fashion to authorize funding for safer vehicles for our ground forces and give our brave men and women in uniform a much needed pay raise. Although it isn't perfect, this bill makes great strides towards honoring and equipping our troops. I'm proud to support it."

Highlights of the bill include:

  • An additional $142 billion in supplemental funding to support the Global War on Terrorism's operational costs, personnel expenses and procurement of new equipment for Fiscal Year 2008.

  • Additional funding for force protection needs in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, including $4.1 billion for state-of-the-art Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles.

  • Additional increases of 13,000 Army and 9,000 Marine Corps active duty personnel to sustain our required missions.

  • A 3.5% pay raise for all members of the armed forces in 2008 and guaranteed pay raises in 2009, 2010 and 2011 to reduce the military-civilian pay disparity.

  • $2.4 billion for an additional 10 C-17's to support intra-theater airlift requirements and meet the airlift needs for the increased end strength in the Army and Marine Corps.

  • An additional $1 billion for National Guard equipment.

  • Extends the prohibition the committee enacted last year on increases to TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Standard.

  • Extends the prohibition the committee enacted last year on retail pharmacy cost share increases.

  • Provides $250 million to address training shortfalls throughout the services and adds $165 million for depot maintenance.

  • Provides a stipend to partially compensate people for the SBP-DIC offset and begins providing combat-related special compensation to some medically retired military personnel with between 15 and 20 years of service.

  • Authorizes capital expenditure investments for U.S. shipyards to be repaid through contract savings in order to improve shipyard efficiency, cost-effectiveness and international competitiveness and requires U.S. shipyards to certify they have attempted to recruit U.S. workers prior to hiring foreign nationals for the construction of U.S. Navy vessels.

  • Prohibits the Department of Defense and defense contractors from procuring goods or services from a source owned or controlled by an entity sanctioned by the U.S. Department of State for violating the Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act (Public Law 106-178).

###

http://republicans.armedservices.house.gov/