Carroll unprepared to attract new jobs
March 3rd, 2007
Kelsey Volkmann, writing for the Baltimore Examiner has an article in the March 2nd, 2007 edition of the paper about
Attracting meaningful jobs and employment and tax base in
And zoning laws in
Hardly a month goes by when folks do not rally against any new business and economic development in a negative contagion that has its roots in a sea change of public opinion against any new housing development.
As much as I have personally had enough of the new houses folks must begin to understand that there is a difference between economic development and residential development.
If that understanding does not develop soon, we will never be able to pay the necessary property taxes to keep the ever-increasing level of services in
Not to mention the enormous “transportation tax”
See my post from December 9th, 2000: 20001209 Transportation 2nd Biggest Family Exp.
A report released November 30 by the Surface Transportation Policy Project (STPP) finds that households in the
The report, "Driven to Spend," compiled data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and found that the poorest fifth of Americans pays a significantly larger percentage of income -- 36 percent—on transportation.
_____
Carroll ‘unprepared’ to attract new jobs
Kelsey Volkmann, The Examiner
Mar 2, 2007 3:00 AM
“Despite its size, location [and] educated and affluent population, Carroll’s economic performance is still that of a rural residential suburb,” according to a report from consultants Parsons Brinckerhoff…
“Carroll’s current inventory of zoned industrial land is in the wrong places, too broken up and outside existing sewer and water services areas.”
Consultants presented their findings Thursday to the Economic Development Commission.
Read the rest of her article here.
####
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.