Journalist @baltimoresun writer artist runner #amwriting Chaplain PIO #partylikeajournalist

Journalist @baltimoresun writer artist runner #amwriting Chaplain PIO #partylikeajournalist
Journalist @baltimoresun writer artist runner #amwriting Md Troopers Assoc #20 & Westminster Md Fire Dept Chaplain PIO #partylikeajournalist
Showing posts with label Journalists Surber-Don Surber. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journalists Surber-Don Surber. Show all posts

Monday, September 17, 2007

20070915 Don Surber: The week that was

September 15th, 2007

Don Surber writes for the Charleston West Virginia Daily Mail and his blog has become a must visit every day. It should be yours also.

I could, if I had the time, link to his blog almost everyday… nevertheless, last Saturday’s post, The week that was, is typically good reading.

My favorite item among many was:

TUESDAY: Fred Thompson declared if elected, he’ll play more Johnny Cash at the White House. My request: “One Piece At A Time.” John Edwards countered by saying if elected, he’ll play more of whatever music his wife says is OK.

Read the rest here: The week that was

####

Note: Mr. Surber says:

From my Galactic Headquarters in Poca, W.Va., I now have bureaus in Houston, Korea, South Hills, London, Washington, Pittsburgh, Tennessee, the Ukraine, Naples (Fla.) and Hudson, N.Y. More bureaus are being set up while you read this. Bureau chiefs file reports intermittently in reports usually cross-posted in the “bureau chief” category. Unless I forget to.

Friday, September 14, 2007

20070912 Comparing MoveOn.org’s NYTimes ad to ads about Sen. John Kerry in 2004

Comparing MoveOn.org’s NYTimes ad to ads about Sen. John Kerry in 2004

September 12th, 2007


A number of folks have vigorously defended The General Petraeus New York Times Ad by regurgitating the Swift Boat Veterans’ ads about 2004 presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry.



To be certain, both Senator Kerry and General Petraeus testified in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.


But here is where the wheels come off the cart. As so eloquently memorialized by Col. Oliver North on August 27th, 2004, in a column titled, “Bring it in John,” he wrote:


On April 22, 1971, under oath, you told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that you had knowledge that American troops "had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam." And you admitted on television that "yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed."


And for good measure you stated, "(America is) more guilty than any other body, of violations of (the) Geneva Conventions ... the torture of prisoners, the killing of prisoners."



In a compare and contrast of General Petraeus and Sen. Kerry, those of us who know history and witnessed the events of April 22, 1971 are quite surprised that liberals dare even mention the name Sen. Kerry in the same paragraph with General Petraeus.


References and related:

20040827 “Bring it on John” by Oliver North

20070912 Hatch on Move On by Don Surber

20070910 The General Petraeus New York Times Ad

20070730 NYTimes Op-Ed: A War We Just Might Win by O’Hanlon and Pollack

20070910 Petraeus Doesn’t Cook the Books Just the facts by Michael O’Hanlon

Thursday, September 13, 2007

20070912 Hatch on Move On by Don Surber


Don Surber calls to our attention: Hatch on Move On

September 12th, 2007 by donsurber


Reference: "20070910 The General Petraeus New York Times Ad"

A grownup has stood up in the Senate to denounce the “Betray Us” ad by MoveOn.org. The Democratic Party should be ashamed that it took Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah to say what has to be said — and to defend the honor of a man who was unanimously appointed by the Senate.

A taste of what he said:

“Now, anyone who has had the opportunity to meet the General, and anybody who has bothered to follow his career or his academic pursuits, knows that these are dangerous and unwarranted allegations. However, there might be a silver lining to this slander. Libel, really, because it was printed The New York Times. Now, all of America understands MoveOn.org and other groups like it are called the nutroots of our society. These people are nuts and they don’t care who they hurt, they don’t care who they smear they don’t care who they libel. Politics is more important than anything else and power is the most important anything of all.”

[…]

Support the troops? Then support the No. 1 Troop — General David Petraeus.

[…]

Read his entire post here: Hatch on Move On

And if “Don Surber” is not part of your daily reading it should be. Find it here: Don Surber

The video is here and here.

http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b372/DonSurber/?action=view&current=HatchOnMoveOn.flv



20070912 Hatch on Move On by Don Surber

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

20070703 House Democrats’ Top 100 Broken Promises

By House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio

July 3rd, 2007

Following-up on “House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio gave the obvious reason why only 14% of the public has confidence in Congress: Democratic leaders have broken 100 promises…”

Please see: 20070702 The Democrats Top 100 Broken Promises by House Republican Leader Boehner Boehner’s planJuly 3rd, 2007.. Hat Tip: Don Surber

House Democrats’ Top 100 Broken Promises

"Six months after taking over Congress, Democrats find they have accomplished little of their agenda."

INTRO

INTRODUCTION

At the beginning of the 110th Congress, the new majority came to power full of promises for a bipartisan working relationship and a landmark pledge to create the “most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.”

Unfortunately, the first six months of Democratic control have been marked by long string of broken promises. Contrary to the pledges they made to the American people, the leaders of the current majority have delivered a more closed, intellectually-dishonest, and ethically ambivalent House of Representatives.

By decree instead of open debate, Democrats have attempted to weaken our national defense and legislate retreat from the Global War on Terror; impose the largest tax increase in American history; propose the most indiscriminate, wasteful spending this Congress has seen in decades; craft multi-billion dollar slush funds for secret earmarks; make gas prices worse by raising taxes and increasing regulation; and cut Medicare at a time when our seniors are enjoying large savings in their prescription drug medicines. This is the wrong direction for the American people.

At the six-month mark of the new majority, the following report takes a look at House Democrats’ Top 100 Broken Promises – and how those broken promises have led to little, if any, accomplishments of note and a record of failure that has undermined the confidence of the American people in this Congress. The report complements efforts by other House Republicans – including the Official Truth Squad led by Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) – who are holding Democrats accountable for their promises. What are some of the most blatant promises broken thus far?

Read the entire piece:

DEMOCRATS' PROMISES

Families, Health Care, Education & Retirement Security

Making America Energy Independent

National & Homeland Security

Fiscal Responsibility & Taxes

Transparency in Spending Taxpayer Dollars

Most Open, Honest & Ethical Congress in History

Open, Fair & Bipartisan Operation of the House Floor

CONCLUSION

DOWNLOAD THE PDF HERE

_____

John Boehner - 8th District of Ohio

Official web site for Representative John A. Boehner (R - OH).

johnboehner.house.gov/

Contact Information - johnboehner.house.gov/contact.asp

Biography - johnboehner.house.gov/bio.asp

News Center - johnboehner.house.gov/news.asp

Republican Leader John Boehner ... - republicanleader.house.gov/

####

20070702 The Democrats Top 100 Broken Promises by House Republican Leader Boehner

July 3rd, 2007

Hat Tip: Don Surber

In case you missed it Don Surber called to our attention the other day an excellent piece by the House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio

Boehner’s plan

July 2nd, 2007 by donsurber

Writing in the Washington Times today, House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio gave the obvious reason why only 14% of the public has confidence in Congress: Democratic leaders have broken 100 promises.

People don’t like being lied to. he wrote:

Read the rest of Mr. Surber’s excellent analysis

Thank you Mr. Surber…

Meanwhile the column to which Mr. Surber is calling to our attention was published Jul 2, 2007 in the Washington Times.

Broken promises

July 2, 2007, By John Boehner –

In November, House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, triumphantly declared that "Democrats are prepared to govern and ready to lead." She said Democrats would make the 110th Congress "the most honest, ethical and open Congress in history." That was then.

It's already June and those promises remain completely unfulfilled. In fact, the biggest problem facing House Democrats is their fondness for making promises — promises they can't make good on or never had any intention of keeping.

Sure, you say, politicians make a lot of promises — but they usually keep at least a few of them.

A report released last week by House Republicans — titled "The Top 100 Broken Promises by Democrats" — chronicles the astonishing divide between what congressional Democrats promised and what they've actually delivered. The leaders of the current majority promised they would run the "most honest, open, and ethical Congress in history." What they've delivered is a more closed, intellectually dishonest and ethically ambivalent legislature — precisely the opposite of what the American people thought they were getting.

The Democrats have been entirely unable to govern and their string of broken promises has left few accomplishments of which to speak. Indeed, nearly half of the 39 bills signed into law either name federal property or build a road.

Not surprisingly, Gallup last week showed that just 14 percent of Americans — an all-time low — have confidence in this Congress. The previous low point for Congress was 18 percent at several points in the time period from 1991 to 1994, the last time Democrats were in power.

Read the rest here: Broken promises

####

Sunday, July 01, 2007

20070630 Don Surber on Congress: Say one thing, do another

Don Surber on Congress: Say one thing, do another.

Saturday, June 30th, 2007

Don Surber’s column this week in the Charleston Daily Mail is on “The public lacks confidence in Congress.”

[…]

Bush is doing better than Congress, which is having its worst year. Ever.

Only 14 percent of the public has confidence in Congress, according to the Gallup Poll. That is below the public confidence level in HMOs.

I can see why Republicans have no confidence in Congress. But independents and Democrats have given up on this crew, which just took charge in January.

[…]

Read his entire column here:The public lacks confidence in Congress.”

####

Saturday, June 02, 2007

20070601 Words of Wisdom from Don Surber

Words of Wisdom from Don Surber

Words of Wisdom from Don Surber that are indeed, as one of the commenters on his post suggested - suitable for framing.

I don’t mean to disillusion you, but …

June 1st, 2007 by donsurber

Your car is not silver; it’s gray.

Your spouse’s car is not champagne; it’s beige.

Global warming isn’t science; it’s paganism.

Drug companies aren’t the enemy; bacteria are.

Food stamps are a subsidy, not a ration.

No one questions your patriotism; it’s your sanity we wonder about.

We can deport 12 million people; it’s the will that’s lacking.

Polar bears aren’t endangered; they’re thriving.

Self-esteem isn’t the problem in schools; ignorance is.

Barbie dolls don’t give girls poor body images; other girls do.

I ain’t your Daddy; taking what I blog personal is your problem, not mine.

Minimum wage was never meant to pay for a new car, a computer, a cellphone, an iPod, and food and shelter for a family of four.

God doesn’t need the government’s help; it’s the other way around.

Man isn’t encroaching on deer habitat; it’s the other way around in West Virginia.

Buckwheat didn’t say “oh-tay”; Porkie did.

Bush didn’t kill Kyoto; Clinton did.

Actually, I do mean to disillusion you; it’s my job.

####

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

20070507 France to US Take us back by Don Surber

Don Surber nails it…France to U.S.: Take us back



May 7th, 2007 by Don Surber



http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/05/07/france-to-us-take-us-back/


AP reported that in their April 28 debate on MSNBC, the 8 Democratic presidential candidates promised to restore America’s standing in the world.


Said New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson: “We are today internationally and domestically a nation that is no longer a leader.”


[…]


Really. Hmm. Said the French people on Sunday: Take us back, America. We’re sorry.


CNN reported a record 85% of French voters turned out to give Conservative Nicolas Sarkozy a landslide win by 6 points. He’s going to cut taxes and to stop the strikes by unions. Sacre bleu, he’s Ronald Reagan.

[

…]


The French elected him because of the November 2005 riots by Muslim youths: L’Intifada. The French are scared to death of the Muslims.


[…]


Read the entire post: France to U.S.: Take us back


####

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Friday, April 20, 2007

20070419 Don Surber Virginia Tech put things in perspective

Don Surber Virginia Tech put things in perspective

Thursday April 19, 2007

As much as I have been attempting to back off and move-on from the Virginia Tech tragedy myself and give the school’s parents, friends and family some peace, I found Don Surber’s column this week in the Charleston Daily Mail puts a few things in perspective and is worth a quick read:

Opinion

Thursday April 19, 2007

Don Surber: Virginia Tech put things in perspective

THE massacre at Virginia Tech suddenly put things into perspective. Much of what we debate is meaningless.

Our time is short. We should put it to better use.

My heart goes out to the parents of those who died or were wounded.

My wife and I have three children who are in their 20s. We are so lucky. I cannot imagine what these parents are enduring.

And my list of victims includes the parents of the young man who was identified as the killer. They are in such a state of shock that they were hospitalized.

That is so sad. From what I gather, they were good parents with a sick son.

Read the rest here: Don Surber: Virginia Tech put things in perspective

####

Thursday, April 19, 2007

20070418 Hillary’s Favorables vs Unfavorables

Hillary’s Favorables vs Unfavorables

April 18th, 2007

Don Surber has a post up about presidential candidate, New York Senator Hillary Clinton’s favorables versus her unfavorables: Hillary Milhous Nixon

She may be nearly 2 years away from her coronation inauguration but Hillary is already looking presidential in the polls.

The Gallup Poll reported she has an unfavorable rating of 52%.

Goodness, that is not far from George Bush’s 60% unfavorable rating, as calculated by Real Clear Politics.

Read the rest here: Hillary Milhous Nixon

And Instapundit weighs-in here: Instapundit.. And gives us a link to a NewBusters’ post:

Hillary Clinton’s Poll Numbers Plummet, Will Media Report It?

Posted by Noel Sheppard on April 18, 2007 - 15:03.

Hmmm

####

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

20070418 Out of the horror emerges a hero


Out of the horror emerges a hero by Andrea Peyser of the New York Post

Don Surber calls to our attention “The best Va. Tech story.”

April 18, 2007

Photo credit: AP

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04172007/news/columnists/out_of_the_horror_emerges_a_hero_columnists_andrea_peyser.htm

Don Surber writes: I kept my big yap shut on Monday about the rampage on Virginia Tech. I had nothing intelligent to offer.

Andrea Peyser of the New York Post did. Her column, “Out of the horror emerges a hero,” is an excellent read. Right from the get go:

POP! One second, Derek O’Dell was studying German in the second-floor Virginia Tech classroom.

The next, he whipped his head around, just in time to see a bullet tear through the skull of the young man sitting next to him.

Even then, Derek, who turned 20 on Friday, thought the whole thing must be a terrible prank.

“And then I saw the blood,” he said quietly.

This newspaper journalism at its best. Read the whole thing, please.

Hat tip: Lucianne.com.

Actually – as called to our attention by one of the commenters, “lawhawk,” on Mr. Surber’s post, I’ve been captivated by the story of the professor from Israel:

I came across this story about another hero; a lecturer visiting from Israel who gave his life so that his students could escape. He also happened to be a Holocaust survivor (and yesterday marked Holocaust Remembrance Day in Israel).

Also from the New York Post – they are carrying a Reuters’ piece: “A History of School Shootings.”

####

Saturday, April 14, 2007

20070413 Cindy Sheehan headbutts MoveOn.org


Cindy Sheehan headbutts MoveOn.org - and her own party


April 13th, 2007


If you think the next two weeks in Washington are going to be interesting, it won’t compare to what the rest of the next two years’ll be like – if the left wing of the Democrats, as exemplified by Cindy Sheehan have their way..


Before it is all over, the biggest challenge for the Democrat Party will not be the opposition Republicans of President George W. Bush – it will be keeping the liberal netroots wing of the party from dragging responsible Democrats into alienating the American public with their hyperbole and theatrics.


As an avid follower of all things political, I have long understood that neither the conservatives nor the liberals speak with one voice. That within each camp of political ideology there are many opinions and at any given time – many disagreements.


Within the Republican Party there is a world of differences between moderate Republicans and conservative Republicans. Just as there is a world of differences between conservative Democrats and liberal Democrats.


In recent years I have always been amused when the mainstream media makes a big deal out of Republicans disagreeing with each other.

I, on the other hand, am uncomfortable when there is little in the way of discussion and dialogue, and various approaches put forth about any given challenge.

Andrew Sullivan said it best in a post on August 17th, 2005, “This red-blue thing isn't real: it's a grid put down on the landscape by lazy pundits in order to foster a conflict that isn't there so the people who profit from conflict can work their way with us.” (“20061128 Rashomon, My Dinner with Andre and Picking out the perfect tree”)

All that said I was doing some research the other night for a piece that has slowing been getting articulated on to my keyboard in which I greatly disagreed with my colleague Andrew Kujan’s post, “Bartlett Ignores Constituent Concerns over Iraq War.”

I have worked with Congressman Roscoe Bartlett for a number of years. And I think I know the 6th Congressional District fairly well and - - well, I guess I just thought that Mr. Kujan’s post was not as thoughtful and deliberative as I find much of his writing. Several things he said are inconsistent with what it is that I believe to be the Congressman Bartlett I have come to know over the years – and the 6th District.

I’ll get back to Mr. Kujan’s post at a later time – in another post.


In my research I came across “Congress and MoveOn” ...by Cindy Sheehan - - “The democratic congress has betrayed American voters, progressive supporters, and the troops in Iraq.” Seems that Ms. Sheehan has some issues with MoveOn and instead of opting to find some common ground for a cohesive and coherent loyal opposition approach to the policies of President George W. Bush’s administration, she has chosen to pee in her own Wheaties.

Now, as anyone knows who has followed by columns and blog posts for the last number of years, Cindy Sheehan has never impressed me as the most cogent contributor to any discussion about American foreign policy or the war in Iraq.

(August 24, 2005, “Cindy Sheehan’s Texas Quagmire:” “Just when you thought that Dr. Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, was one fry short of a happy meal, in walks – stage left, way-left – Cindy Sheehan to super-size the totally bizarre state of political discourse in our great country.”)

When the Democrats won a majority in Congress in the last election, I predicted two things; the liberal Democrats will over-play their hand and leave conservative Democrats and Republicans behind shaking their heads.


And that the liberal wing of the Democrat Party would hijack the opportunity to lead and govern by acting out on the many real and perceived slights at the hands of Republican majority for so many years and would deteriorate into investigation after investigation and reprisal after reprisal.


But ultimately, the Democrats would deteriorate into so much infighting as to deny themselves an opportunity to lead the country in any different direction.

In order for the liberal Democrats to prevail in charting a different course they must find a course that brings along as many conservative Democrats and Republicans as possible. They must remain as cohesive – and coherent as possible.

As I wrote on April 4, 2007, “Dems declare war on Mormon Crickets:”

“In order to procure a winning, albeit razor thin, margin in the voting on the supplemental budget, both the House and the Senate bills were "so loaded with pork, congressmen could die of trichinosis," quipped political commentator Don Surber.

“And the numbers are staggering. President Bush's initial request was for $103 billion and yet the Senate tacked on $18.5 billion in earmarked pet pork projects, spending totally unrelated to the war effort and the House hung $20 billion onto the funding request.”

Then I read this piece by Cindy Sheehan posted on Michael Moore’s web site and I said a prayer for all my colleagues who fervent believe that our great nation must pursue a different approach in Iraq: “Congress and MoveOn.”

“THE DEMOCRATS ARE FUNDING IRAQ ESCALATION: The Democratic leadership has proposed $100 billion of supplemental funding for an increased troop presence in Iraq. The leadership opted for the "slow bleed" policy over a month ago. This extends the occupation for at least another 18 months, and allows permanent placement of troops thereafter for "training" or "combating terrorism." It also will permit the Bush Administration to initiate a war with Iran without Congressional oversight. The surge of 20,000 troops recently increased to 30,000 and will likely increase to 100,000 by year-end…”

[…]

“In 2002 the Democrats authorized Bush to invade Iraq (or any other country he deemed to support terrorism, for example Iran) in hope he would become involved in an unpopular war which would produce a Democratic White House.”

[…]

“As a consequence, Americans now think even more poorly of Congress than ever; the failure to withdraw from Iraq dropped Democratic support of Congress from 44% to 33% according to the latest Gallup poll. The Democrats failure to stem what has become a Democrats war will be a factor in the 2008 elections.”

[…]

“MoveOn is an autocratic organization run by a small group of elitist wannabe power-brokers; it cannot be reformed, but you can let their politburo know your feelings (eli@moveon.org, Namrita.Chaudhary@gmail.com, tom@moveon.org), and you can unsubscribe! You also can refuse to lend them your name (their petitions are mainly for fund-raising), your efforts, and your money, and instead join with one of the many active progressive and antiwar organizations (check out United for Peace and Justice- UFPJ for a detailed listing of local and national groups, which incidentally does not include MoveOn). None of the MoveOn leadership has served their country in the armed forces; like Dick Cheney and 95% of Congress they had more important things to do, which did not and do not include supporting the troops that are in harms way.

Ay caramba. Read the rest of her vitriol here – and say a prayer for the Democrats and our nation: “Congress and MoveOn.”

Want more? Read, “Leaders vs. Climbers.”

Or, “MoveOn moves in with Pelosi | Salon News:”

“I was annoyed by MoveOn's decision to deal with Iraq war legislation in a pragmatic and incremental fashion. I see a fundamental disconnect between their grassroots organizing and rhetoric on the one hand, and the pragmatic lobbying that led them to endorse Pelosi's rather weak bill on the other. A similar annoyance among many of MoveOn's members is the subject of Farhad Manjoo's latest article in Salon, MoveOn moves in with Pelosi.”

Or read: “the art of the possible:”

“I always find it distressing and absurd when politicians bemoan that only so much of their agenda is politically possible, then proceed to do absolutely nothing to actually move the goal posts of possibility by spending their political capital. I am bemused by Congressional Democrats and their apologists who point out that only so much progress on ending the war can 'pragmatically' be made, and thus we must compromise and accomplish what little we can.”

Read the rest here: “the art of the possible.”

It is going to be a really interesting two years.

####

Monday, April 09, 2007

20070408 Soundtrack Snapshots



Soundtrack Snapshots

April 8th, 2007

All about old big fish, dandelions and speeding cows

I hope everyone had a nice Easter holiday weekend…

Looking at the week preceding Easter, the Washington Post carried a Reuters brief Politics Summary.

They are only but a paragraph in length and can be found here: “Reuters Politics Summary.”

Topics included:

Bush prays for safety of U.S. troops on Easter

Stem cell vote set for Congress this week

U.S. Gov. Richardson arrives in North Korea: KCNA

Top U.S. diplomat visits Somalia to urge truce

McCain says he misspoke in upbeat Baghdad comments

Iraq war protester marches to Bush's ranch

Cheney accuses Pelosi of "bad behavior" in Syria

No sign of compromise on Iraq by Bush, Democrats

Hanoi police manhandled dissidents' wives: U.S.

_____

In other news, Don Surber helps us understand: How they knew the fish was 90.” April 8th, 2007 by donsurber:

Dan Joling of the AP reported that fishermen caught a 90-year-old fish in the waters off Alaska:

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — A commercial fishing boat has pulled up what could have been one of the oldest creatures in Alaska — a giant rockfish estimated to be about a century old.

The 44-inch, 60-pound female shortraker rockfish was caught last month by the catcher-processor Kodiak Enterprise, owned by Trident Seafoods, south of the Pribilof Islands in the Bering Sea.

Read the rest here: How they knew the fish was 90.”

_____

In one of my favorites, Doug Oster of TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES explained March 28, 2007 how the lowly dandelion is really a very much-maligned plant.

Lawn foe a surprisingly good green.”

Yes, count me in as someone who also likes dandelions…

Dandelions are incredible. There, I've said it. I'm proud that they are part of my garden and my diet.

Thousands, maybe millions of dollars are spent each year in an effort to eradicate this so-called weed, but dandelions actually are among the world's great plants in terms of nutrition. They are an excellent source of antioxidants and beta carotene.

They also are high in potassium, iron, calcium, phosphorus and magnesium and are loaded with vitamins A, C and E. Want to know another secret? They taste good.

When I tell people I love dandelions, the reactions are mixed. Some look at me in disbelief, given my reputation as a devoted gardener…

Read the rest here: Lawn foe a surprisingly good green.”

_____

The smack down of the week was the Washington Post’s editorial last Thursday on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s excellent adventure: “Pratfall in Damascus: Nancy Pelosi's foolish shuttle diplomacy.”

Thursday, April 5, 2007; A16

HOUSE SPEAKER Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered an excellent demonstration yesterday of why members of Congress should not attempt to supplant the secretary of state when traveling abroad.

[…]

"We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace," Ms. Pelosi grandly declared.

Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush's military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish. (My emphasis)

I could not agree more.

Commentary about such matters has become so predictable that it has been rendered uninformative. The lefty bloggers and the main stream media will defend democrats no matter what they do and the righty wing-nuts will criticize Democrats no matter what they do. It has become one big yawn. But when a mainstream media standard-bearer such as the Washington Post weighs-in, then that becomes news in and of itself. And the Washington Post was not the only standard-bearer to criticize her ill-advised adventure.

What was she thinking?

Read the entire editorial here: “Pratfall in Damascus: Nancy Pelosi's foolish shuttle diplomacy.”

Wanna read more? Check out “An Arab-American rebukes Pelosi” posted by Thomas Lifson

Emilio Dabaul, an Arab-American with relatives in Syria, writes a superb rebuke to Nancy Pelosi on the website of the American Congress for Truth. This one is a must-read, and I take off my hat to Mr. Dabaul and ACT for a piece that is logical, clear, well-written, and full of passion. Follow the link, but here is a brief taste: …

_____

Don Surber calls to our attention the O’Reilly – Rivera shouting match: “So much Hot Air.”

2. Hot Air also has Bill O’Reilly vs. Geraldo Rivera. I saw the thing live and thought it was the usual over-the-top shouting match that should be reserved for Sweeps Months. But hey, readers can decide for themselves.

I missed it because I changed the channel to the “Food Network.” I find these childish food fights of kindergarten proportions to be a waste of my time. If I want to witness inane and uninformed conversations performed by folks with their eyes bulging and their veins popping – I’ll go to a local public hearing. Well, then again - maybe not. I always have my sock drawer to re-arrange… I gain little value out of such shouting matches and I thought that both Mr. O’Reilly and Mr. Rivera made fools of themselves.

_____

Don Surber, the inventor of the “Name that party” game in which the main stream media identifies Republicans who mess-up right away in the news article but somehow always seem to either, not identify of bury the identification of wrongdoing Democrats; seems to have invented yet another media game:

Name That Party 2.0

There have been complaints that “Name That Party” is too easy. In this game, I post a newspaper story about a political scandal. Readers then guess which party the crook belongs to simply based on which paragraph the reporter discloses the crook’s party.

It did get too easy. Republicans were identified as Republicans within the first 3 paragraphs. Democrats, well, sometimes they were not called Democrats even after 63 paragraphs. Ain’t that right, Matthew Dolan of the Baltimore Sun?

So I am rolling out a new game: Pet or Pork?

Read the entire post here: Name That Party 2.0

_____

Don Surber comments on the favorite game of liberals, class warfare:

NYT: Women, minorities hardest hit by global warming

April 1st, 2007 by donsurber

The joke for years was if the world ended, the New York Times’ headline would read: “Women, minorities hardest hit.”

The joke came true today in this actual NYT headline:

Poor Nations to Bear Brunt as World Warms

The photograph with it showed: “A woman harvesting corn in Malawi, an African country that is already prone to drought and faces grim prospects under global warming.”

Women? Check. Minorities? Check. Let’s roll. The story began:

Read the rest of the post here: “NYT: Women, minorities hardest hit by global warming

_____

Last but not least, Mark Tapscott of “Tapscott’s Copy Desk” continues to keep us informed on pork and earmarks: “Kudos to OMB for Updated Online Earmarks Database.”

If you have not been following Mr. Tapscott’s coverage of the wasteful, bankrupting and incomprehensible spending of Congress, click on Mr. Tapscott’s labels for: Porkbusters and Earmarks

_____

Quote of the week:

Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on earth, with a top speed of 120 ft/sec, is a cow that has been dropped out of a helicopter.” Dave Barry

####

Monday, April 02, 2007

20070402 President Bush and Senator Bryd

President Bush and Senator Bryd

April 2nd, 2007

Hat tip: Don Surberfrom last Friday.

Touching photo…

I found this picture on Don Surber’s blog:

“One of the most touching photos in years taken by an AP photographer moved across the wires last night (Thursday) and few newspapers published it. The Daily Mail did. It showed President Bush helping Robert Byrd walk.”

The rest of his comments on the photo can be found here: “1,000 words.”

####